(* ========================================================================== *)
(* FLYSPECK - BOOK FORMALIZATION                                              *)
(*                                                                            *)
(* Lemma: PPHEUFG                                                             *)
(* Chapter: Tame Hypermap                                                     *)
(* Authors: Trieu Thi Diep, Alexey Solovyev                                   *)
(* Date: 2010-02-26                                                           *)
(* ========================================================================== *)



module type Tame_opposite_type = sig

end;;

flyspeck_needs "hypermap/hypermap.hl";;
flyspeck_needs "tame/tame_defs.hl";;

module Tame_opposite  = struct


open Hypermap;;
open Tame_defs;;


(* LEMMA: general *)
let tuple_opposite_hypermap = prove
(`!(H:(A)hypermap). tuple_hypermap (opposite_hypermap H) = ((dart H),face_map H o node_map H , inverse(node_map H),inverse(face_map H))`,
  GEN_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[opposite_hypermap] THEN
    REWRITE_TAC[GSYM hypermap_tybij] THEN
    MP_TAC (SPEC `H:(A)hypermap` hypermap_lemma) THEN
    STRIP_TAC THEN
    ASM_SIMP_TAC[PERMUTES_INVERSE; PERMUTES_COMPOSE] THEN
    REWRITE_TAC[FUN_EQ_THM; o_THM; I_THM] THEN
    MP_TAC (ISPECL [`(node_map H):A->A`; `(dart H):A->bool`] PERMUTES_INVERSES_o) THEN
    MP_TAC (ISPECL [`(face_map H):A->A`; `(dart H):A->bool`] PERMUTES_INVERSES_o) THEN
    ASM_SIMP_TAC[FUN_EQ_THM; o_THM; I_THM]);;




(* LEMMA: plain (tame_1a) *)
let opposite_hypermap_plain = prove ( `!(H:(A)hypermap).
       plain_hypermap H ==> plain_hypermap (opposite_hypermap H)`,
   GEN_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[plain_hypermap] THEN
     DISCH_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[edge_map; tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
     SUBGOAL_THEN `(face_map (H:(A)hypermap) o node_map H) o face_map H o node_map H = (face_map H) o ((node_map H) o (face_map H) o (edge_map H)) o (edge_map H) o (node_map H)` MP_TAC THENL
     [
       POP_ASSUM MP_TAC THEN
         SIMP_TAC[FUN_EQ_THM; o_THM; I_THM];
       ALL_TAC
     ] THEN
     DISCH_THEN (fun th -> REWRITE_TAC[th]) THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[hypermap_cyclic; I_O_ID]);;



(* LEMMA: general *)
let opposite_components = prove(`!(H:(A)hypermap) x.
        dart (opposite_hypermap H) = dart H /\
        node (opposite_hypermap H) x = node H x /\
        face (opposite_hypermap H) x = face H x`,
   REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
     CONJ_TAC THENL
     [
       REWRITE_TAC[node; node_map; tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
         REWRITE_TAC[GSYM node_map];
       REWRITE_TAC[face; face_map; tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
         REWRITE_TAC[GSYM face_map]
     ] THEN
     MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_card_inverse_map_eq THEN
     EXISTS_TAC `(dart H):A->bool` THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[hypermap_lemma]);;




(* LEMMA: simple (tame_2b) *)
let opposite_hypermap_simple = prove ( `!(H:(A)hypermap).
                simple_hypermap H ==> simple_hypermap (opposite_hypermap H)`,
   GEN_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[simple_hypermap; opposite_components] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap]);;



(* LEMMA: general *)
let hypermap_eq_lemma = prove(`!(H:(A)hypermap). tuple_hypermap H = dart H,edge_map H,node_map H,face_map H`,
    GEN_TAC THEN
      MP_TAC (ISPEC `tuple_hypermap (H:(A)hypermap)` PAIR_SURJECTIVE) THEN
      STRIP_TAC THEN
      MP_TAC (ISPEC `y:(A->A)#(A->A)#(A->A)` PAIR_SURJECTIVE) THEN
      STRIP_TAC THEN
      MP_TAC (ISPEC `y':(A->A)#(A->A)` PAIR_SURJECTIVE) THEN
      STRIP_TAC THEN
      ASM_REWRITE_TAC[PAIR_EQ] THEN
      ASM_REWRITE_TAC[dart; edge_map; node_map; face_map]);;



(* LEMMA: general *)
let opposite_opposite_hypermap_eq_hypermap = prove(`!(H:(A)hypermap). opposite_hypermap (opposite_hypermap H) = H`,
   ONCE_REWRITE_TAC[GSYM hypermap_tybij] THEN
     GEN_TAC THEN
     AP_TERM_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[tuple_opposite_hypermap; hypermap_eq_lemma; PAIR_EQ] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[dart; face_map; node_map; tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM dart; GSYM face_map; GSYM node_map] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM inverse2_hypermap_maps] THEN
     CONJ_TAC THEN MATCH_MP_TAC (GEN_ALL PERMUTES_INVERSE_INVERSE) THEN
     EXISTS_TAC `dart (H:(A)hypermap)` THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[hypermap_lemma]);;





(* LEMMA: aux *)
let truncated_path_lemma = prove(`!(H:(A)hypermap) p q n. is_path H p n /\
                                   (!i. i <= n ==> q i = p i)
                                 ==> is_path H q n`,
   REPLICATE_TAC 3 GEN_TAC THEN
     INDUCT_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[is_path] THEN
     STRIP_TAC THEN
     FIRST_X_ASSUM (MP_TAC o check (is_imp o concl)) THEN
     ASM_REWRITE_TAC[] THEN
     ANTS_TAC THENL
     [
       GEN_TAC THEN
         ASM_SIMP_TAC[ARITH_RULE `i <= n ==> i <= SUC n`];
       ALL_TAC
     ] THEN
     FIRST_ASSUM (MP_TAC o SPEC `n:num`) THEN
     FIRST_ASSUM (MP_TAC o SPEC `SUC n`) THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[LE_REFL; ARITH_RULE `n <= SUC n`] THEN
     ASM_SIMP_TAC[]);;



(* LEMMA: general *)
let opposite_path = prove(`!(H:(A)hypermap) p n. is_path H p n ==>
                            ?q m. is_path (opposite_hypermap H) q m /\
                            q 0 = p 0 /\ q m = p n`,
   GEN_TAC THEN GEN_TAC THEN
     INDUCT_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[is_path] THENL
     [
       MAP_EVERY EXISTS_TAC [`p:num->A`; `0`] THEN
         REWRITE_TAC[is_path];
       ALL_TAC
     ] THEN
     STRIP_TAC THEN
     FIRST_X_ASSUM (MP_TAC o check (is_imp o concl)) THEN
     ASM_REWRITE_TAC[] THEN
     STRIP_TAC THEN
     FIRST_X_ASSUM (MP_TAC o check (fun th -> rator (rator (concl th)) = `go_one_step (H:(A)hypermap)`)) THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[go_one_step] THEN
     STRIP_TAC THENL
     [
       EXISTS_TAC `(\i:num. if i <= m then (q:num->A) i else (if i = m + 1 then inverse (node_map H) (q m) else edge_map H ((p:num->A) n)))` THEN
         EXISTS_TAC `SUC(SUC m)` THEN
         BETA_TAC THEN
         ASM_SIMP_TAC[LE_0; ARITH_RULE `~(SUC (SUC m) <= m)`; ARITH_RULE `~(SUC(SUC m) = m + 1)`] THEN
         REWRITE_TAC[is_path] THEN
         REPEAT STRIP_TAC THENL
         [
           MATCH_MP_TAC truncated_path_lemma THEN
             EXISTS_TAC `q:num->A` THEN
             ASM_SIMP_TAC[];

           ASM_REWRITE_TAC[LE_REFL; ARITH_RULE `~(m = m + 1)`; ARITH_RULE `~(SUC m <= m)`; ARITH_RULE `SUC m = m + 1`] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[go_one_step] THEN
             DISJ2_TAC THEN DISJ1_TAC THEN
             GEN_REWRITE_TAC (RAND_CONV o DEPTH_CONV) [node_map] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[tuple_opposite_hypermap];

           ASM_REWRITE_TAC[ARITH_RULE `~(SUC m <= m) /\ ~(SUC (SUC m) <= m) /\ ~(SUC (SUC m) = m + 1) /\ SUC m = m + 1`] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[go_one_step] THEN
             DISJ2_TAC THEN DISJ2_TAC THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[face_map] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
             MP_TAC (SPEC `H:(A)hypermap` inverse2_hypermap_maps) THEN
             SIMP_TAC[o_THM; FUN_EQ_THM];
         ];

      EXISTS_TAC `(\i:num. if i <= m then (q:num->A) i else (if i = m + 1 then ((face_map H) o (node_map H)) (q m) else node_map H ((p:num->A) n)))` THEN
         EXISTS_TAC `SUC(SUC m)` THEN
         BETA_TAC THEN
         ASM_SIMP_TAC[LE_0; ARITH_RULE `~(SUC (SUC m) <= m)`; ARITH_RULE `~(SUC(SUC m) = m + 1)`] THEN
         REWRITE_TAC[is_path] THEN
         REPEAT STRIP_TAC THENL
         [
           MATCH_MP_TAC truncated_path_lemma THEN
             EXISTS_TAC `q:num->A` THEN
             ASM_SIMP_TAC[];

           ASM_REWRITE_TAC[LE_REFL; ARITH_RULE `~(m = m + 1)`; ARITH_RULE `~(SUC m <= m)`; ARITH_RULE `SUC m = m + 1`] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[go_one_step] THEN
             DISJ1_TAC THEN
             GEN_REWRITE_TAC (RAND_CONV o DEPTH_CONV) [edge_map] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[tuple_opposite_hypermap];

           ASM_REWRITE_TAC[ARITH_RULE `~(SUC m <= m) /\ ~(SUC (SUC m) <= m) /\ ~(SUC (SUC m) = m + 1) /\ SUC m = m + 1`] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[go_one_step] THEN
             DISJ2_TAC THEN DISJ2_TAC THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[face_map] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[GSYM face_map] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[o_THM] THEN
             MP_TAC (ISPECL [`face_map (H:(A)hypermap)`; `dart (H:(A)hypermap)`] PERMUTES_INVERSES_o) THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[hypermap_lemma; FUN_EQ_THM; o_THM; I_THM] THEN
             SIMP_TAC[];
         ];

      EXISTS_TAC `(\i:num. if i <= m then (q:num->A) i else (if i = m + 1 then inverse (node_map H) (q m) else face_map H ((p:num->A) n)))` THEN
         EXISTS_TAC `SUC(SUC m)` THEN
         BETA_TAC THEN
         ASM_SIMP_TAC[LE_0; ARITH_RULE `~(SUC (SUC m) <= m)`; ARITH_RULE `~(SUC(SUC m) = m + 1)`] THEN
         REWRITE_TAC[is_path] THEN
         REPEAT STRIP_TAC THENL
         [
           MATCH_MP_TAC truncated_path_lemma THEN
             EXISTS_TAC `q:num->A` THEN
             ASM_SIMP_TAC[];

           ASM_REWRITE_TAC[LE_REFL; ARITH_RULE `~(m = m + 1)`; ARITH_RULE `~(SUC m <= m)`; ARITH_RULE `SUC m = m + 1`] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[go_one_step] THEN
             DISJ2_TAC THEN DISJ1_TAC THEN
             GEN_REWRITE_TAC (RAND_CONV o DEPTH_CONV) [node_map] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[tuple_opposite_hypermap];

           ASM_REWRITE_TAC[ARITH_RULE `~(SUC m <= m) /\ ~(SUC (SUC m) <= m) /\ ~(SUC (SUC m) = m + 1) /\ SUC m = m + 1`] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[go_one_step] THEN
             DISJ1_TAC THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[edge_map] THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
             MP_TAC (ISPECL [`node_map (H:(A)hypermap)`; `dart (H:(A)hypermap)`] PERMUTES_INVERSES_o) THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[hypermap_lemma; FUN_EQ_THM; o_THM; I_THM] THEN
             SIMP_TAC[]
         ]
     ]);;



(* LEMMA: general *)
let opposite_path_alt = prove(`!(H:(A)hypermap) q m. is_path (opposite_hypermap H) q m
                              ==> (?p n. is_path H p n /\
                                     p 0 = q 0 /\ p n = q m)`,
   REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN
     ONCE_REWRITE_TAC[GSYM opposite_opposite_hypermap_eq_hypermap] THEN
     MATCH_MP_TAC opposite_path THEN
     ASM_REWRITE_TAC[]);;



(* LEMMA: general *)
let opposite_sets_of_components = prove(`!H:(A)hypermap.
     node_set (opposite_hypermap H) = node_set H /\
     face_set (opposite_hypermap H) = face_set H /\
     set_of_components (opposite_hypermap H) = set_of_components H`,
  REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN
    REWRITE_TAC[node_set; face_set; set_of_orbits] THEN
    REWRITE_TAC[GSYM node; GSYM face; opposite_components] THEN
    REWRITE_TAC[dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
    SUBGOAL_THEN `!x y:A. (?(p:num->A) n. p 0 = x /\ p n = y /\ is_path H p n) <=> (?(q:num->A) m. q 0 = x /\ q m = y /\ is_path (opposite_hypermap H) q m)` ASSUME_TAC THENL
    [
      REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN EQ_TAC THEN STRIP_TAC THENL
        [
          ONCE_REWRITE_TAC[TAUT `A /\ B /\ C <=> C /\ A /\ B`] THEN
            REPLICATE_TAC 2 (FIRST_X_ASSUM ((fun th -> REWRITE_TAC[SYM th]) o check (is_eq o concl))) THEN
            MATCH_MP_TAC opposite_path THEN
            ASM_REWRITE_TAC[];
          ONCE_REWRITE_TAC[TAUT `A /\ B /\ C <=> C /\ A /\ B`] THEN
            REPLICATE_TAC 2 (FIRST_X_ASSUM ((fun th -> REWRITE_TAC[SYM th]) o check (is_eq o concl))) THEN
            MATCH_MP_TAC opposite_path_alt THEN
            ASM_REWRITE_TAC[]
        ];
      ALL_TAC
    ] THEN
    REWRITE_TAC[set_of_components; set_part_components; dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
    ASM_REWRITE_TAC[GSYM dart; comb_component; is_in_component]);;




(* LEMMA: connected (tame_2a) *)
let opposite_hypermap_connected = prove (
`!(H:(A)hypermap).connected_hypermap H ==> connected_hypermap (opposite_hypermap H)`,
     REWRITE_TAC[connected_hypermap;number_of_components; opposite_sets_of_components]);;



(* LEMMA: is_edge_nondegenerate (tame_3) *)
let opposite_nondegenerate = prove (`!(H:(A)hypermap).
        plain_hypermap H /\ is_edge_nondegenerate H ==> is_edge_nondegenerate (opposite_hypermap H)`,
   GEN_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[plain_hypermap; is_edge_nondegenerate] THEN
     REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN
     POP_ASSUM MP_TAC THEN POP_ASSUM MP_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[dart; edge_map; tuple_opposite_hypermap] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM dart] THEN
     DISCH_TAC THEN FIRST_X_ASSUM (MP_TAC o check (is_forall o concl)) THEN
     ONCE_REWRITE_TAC[TAUT `(A ==> ~B) <=> (B ==> ~A)`] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[NOT_FORALL_THM; TAUT `~(A ==> ~B) <=> A /\ B`] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[o_THM] THEN DISCH_TAC THEN
     EXISTS_TAC `node_map H (x:A)` THEN
     ASM_SIMP_TAC[lemma_dart_invariant] THEN
     POP_ASSUM (fun th -> GEN_REWRITE_TAC (LAND_CONV o DEPTH_CONV) [SYM th]) THEN
     MP_TAC (REWRITE_RULE[FUN_EQ_THM; o_THM; I_THM] hypermap_lemma) THEN
     SIMP_TAC[]);;




(* LEMMA: is_no_double_joints (tame_5a) *)
let opposite_no_double_joints = prove(`!H:(A)hypermap.
                is_no_double_joints H /\ plain_hypermap H
                                      ==> is_no_double_joints (opposite_hypermap H)`,
   GEN_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[is_no_double_joints; edge_map_convolution] THEN
     STRIP_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[tuple_opposite_hypermap; opposite_components; edge_map] THEN
     REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN
     ABBREV_TAC `z:A = node_map H y` THEN
     ABBREV_TAC `u:A = node_map H x` THEN
     SUBGOAL_THEN `z:A = u:A ==> x:A = y` MATCH_MP_TAC THENL
     [
       EXPAND_TAC "z" THEN EXPAND_TAC "u" THEN
         SIMP_TAC[node_map_injective; EQ_SYM];
       ALL_TAC
     ] THEN
     MATCH_MP_TAC EQ_SYM THEN
     FIRST_X_ASSUM MATCH_MP_TAC THEN
     SUBGOAL_THEN `node H (y:A) = node H x` ASSUME_TAC THENL
     [
       MATCH_MP_TAC EQ_SYM THEN
         MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_node_identity THEN
         ASM_REWRITE_TAC[];
       ALL_TAC
     ] THEN

     REPEAT CONJ_TAC THENL
     [
       EXPAND_TAC "u" THEN
         ASM_SIMP_TAC[lemma_dart_invariant];

       SUBGOAL_THEN `node H (u:A) = node H y` ASSUME_TAC THENL
         [
           MATCH_MP_TAC EQ_SYM THEN
             MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_node_identity THEN
             ASM_REWRITE_TAC[] THEN
             EXPAND_TAC "u" THEN
             MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_in_node1 THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[node_refl];
           ALL_TAC
         ] THEN
         POP_ASSUM (fun th -> REWRITE_TAC[th]) THEN
         EXPAND_TAC "z" THEN
         MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_in_node1 THEN
         REWRITE_TAC[node_refl];
       ALL_TAC
     ] THEN

     ASM_REWRITE_TAC[o_THM] THEN
     SUBGOAL_THEN `!v w:A. v IN node H w ==> node_map H v IN node H (node_map H w)` MATCH_MP_TAC THENL
     [
       REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN
         MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_in_node1 THEN
         SUBGOAL_THEN `node H (node_map H (w:A)) = node H w` (fun th -> REWRITE_TAC[th]) THENL
         [
           MATCH_MP_TAC EQ_SYM THEN
             MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_node_identity THEN
             MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_in_node1 THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[node_refl];
           ALL_TAC
         ] THEN
         ASM_REWRITE_TAC[];
       ALL_TAC
     ] THEN
     FIRST_X_ASSUM (MP_TAC o check (is_binary "IN" o concl)) THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[o_THM] THEN
     EXPAND_TAC "z" THEN EXPAND_TAC "u" THEN
     SIMP_TAC[]);;



(* LEMMA: general *)
let plain_hypermap_edge = prove(`!(H:(A)hypermap) x.
                                  plain_hypermap H ==> edge H x = {x, edge_map H x}`,
   REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[plain_hypermap] THEN
     DISCH_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[edge] THEN
     SPEC_TAC (`x:A`, `x:A`) THEN
     MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_orbit_convolution_map THEN
     ASM_REWRITE_TAC[]);;


(* LEMMA: no_loops (tame_4) *)
let opposite_no_loops = prove(`!H:(A)hypermap.
                                no_loops H /\ plain_hypermap H
                                ==> no_loops (opposite_hypermap H)`,
   GEN_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[no_loops] THEN
     STRIP_TAC THEN
     FIRST_ASSUM (MP_TAC o (fun th -> MATCH_MP plain_hypermap_edge th)) THEN
     FIRST_ASSUM (MP_TAC o (fun th -> MATCH_MP opposite_hypermap_plain th)) THEN
     DISCH_THEN (MP_TAC o (fun th -> MATCH_MP plain_hypermap_edge th)) THEN
     POP_ASSUM MP_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[edge_map_convolution] THEN
     DISCH_TAC THEN
     DISCH_THEN (fun th -> REWRITE_TAC[th]) THEN
     DISCH_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[opposite_components; edge_map; tuple_opposite_hypermap; o_THM] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[Collect_geom.IN_SET2] THEN
     REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN
     SUBGOAL_THEN `node_map H (x:A) = node_map H y ==> x = y` MATCH_MP_TAC THENL
     [
       REWRITE_TAC[node_map_injective];
       ALL_TAC
     ] THEN
     FIRST_X_ASSUM MATCH_MP_TAC THEN
     CONJ_TAC THENL
     [
       ASM_REWRITE_TAC[o_THM; Collect_geom.IN_SET2];
       MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_in_node1 THEN
         SUBGOAL_THEN `node H (node_map H (y:A)) = node H y` (fun th -> REWRITE_TAC[th]) THENL
         [
           MATCH_MP_TAC EQ_SYM THEN
             MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_node_identity THEN
             MATCH_MP_TAC lemma_in_node1 THEN
             REWRITE_TAC[node_refl];
           ALL_TAC
         ] THEN
         ASM_REWRITE_TAC[]
     ]);;



(* LEMMA: aux *)
let edge_CARD_dart = prove(`!H:(A)hypermap.
                             plain_hypermap H /\ is_edge_nondegenerate H ==>
                             CARD (dart H) = 2 * number_of_edges H`,
   GEN_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[plain_hypermap; is_edge_nondegenerate] THEN
     STRIP_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[number_of_edges; edge_set] THEN
     MATCH_MP_TAC (REWRITE_RULE[number_of_orbits] lemma_card_eq) THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[hypermap_lemma] THEN
     REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN
     MP_TAC (SPECL [`(dart H):A->bool`; `(edge_map H):A->A`] lemma_orbit_of_size_2) THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[hypermap_lemma] THEN
     DISCH_THEN (fun th -> REWRITE_TAC[th]) THEN
     FIRST_X_ASSUM (MP_TAC o SPEC `x:A`) THEN
     FIRST_X_ASSUM (MP_TAC o check (is_eq o concl)) THEN
     ASM_SIMP_TAC[FUN_EQ_THM; o_THM; I_THM]);;


(* LEMMA: aux *)
let edge_CARD = prove(`!H:(A)hypermap.
                        plain_hypermap H /\ is_edge_nondegenerate H ==>
                        number_of_edges H = CARD (dart H) DIV 2`,
   GEN_TAC THEN
     DISCH_THEN (ASSUME_TAC o (fun th -> MATCH_MP edge_CARD_dart th)) THEN
     MATCH_MP_TAC EQ_SYM THEN MATCH_MP_TAC DIV_UNIQ THEN
     EXISTS_TAC `0` THEN ASM_REWRITE_TAC[] THEN
     ARITH_TAC);;




(* LEMMA: planar (tame_1b) *)
let opposite_planar = prove ( `!(H:(A)hypermap).
                planar_hypermap H /\ is_edge_nondegenerate H /\ plain_hypermap H
                              ==> planar_hypermap (opposite_hypermap H)`,
   GEN_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[planar_hypermap] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[number_of_nodes; number_of_faces; number_of_components] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[opposite_sets_of_components] THEN
     DISCH_THEN (CONJUNCTS_THEN2 MP_TAC ASSUME_TAC) THEN
     MP_TAC (SPEC `opposite_hypermap (H:(A)hypermap)` edge_CARD) THEN
     ASM_SIMP_TAC[opposite_hypermap_plain; opposite_nondegenerate] THEN
     MP_TAC (SPEC `H:(A)hypermap` edge_CARD) THEN
     ASM_SIMP_TAC[dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap]);;




(* LEMMA: tame_8 *)
let CARD_faces1 = prove (`! (H:(A)hypermap).
        tame_8 H  ==> tame_8 (opposite_hypermap H) `,
   REWRITE_TAC[tame_8; number_of_faces; opposite_sets_of_components]);;



(* LEMMA: tame_9a *)
let CARD_in_face = prove ( `!(H:(A)hypermap).
        tame_9a H   ==> tame_9a (opposite_hypermap H) `,
   REWRITE_TAC[tame_9a; opposite_components] THEN
     SIMP_TAC[dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap]);;


(* LEMMA: tame_10 *)
let CARD_nodes = prove (`!H:(A)hypermap.
        tame_10 H ==> tame_10 (opposite_hypermap H)`,
   REWRITE_TAC[tame_10; opposite_sets_of_components; number_of_nodes]);;


(* LEMMA: tame_11a /\ tame_11b *)
let CARD_in_node = prove ( `!(H:(A)hypermap).
        tame_11a H  /\ tame_11b H ==>
        tame_11a (opposite_hypermap H) /\ tame_11b (opposite_hypermap H)`,
   REWRITE_TAC[tame_11a; tame_11b; opposite_components] THEN
     SIMP_TAC[dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap]);;



(* LEMMA: general *)
let the_SAME_orbit_triangles = prove (`!(H:(A)hypermap) x.
        set_of_triangles_meeting_node H x =
               set_of_triangles_meeting_node (opposite_hypermap H) x`,
   REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[set_of_triangles_meeting_node] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[opposite_components] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap]);;


(* LEMMA: general *)
let the_SAME_orbit_quadrilaterals = prove (`!(H:(A)hypermap) x.
        set_of_quadrilaterals_meeting_node H x =
               set_of_quadrilaterals_meeting_node (opposite_hypermap H) x`,
   REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[set_of_quadrilaterals_meeting_node] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[opposite_components; dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap]);;


(* LEMMA: general *)
let the_SAME_orbit_exceptional = prove (`!(H:(A)hypermap) x.
        set_of_exceptional_meeting_node H x =
               set_of_exceptional_meeting_node (opposite_hypermap H) x`,
   REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[set_of_exceptional_meeting_node] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[opposite_components; dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap]);;



(* LEMMA: general *)
let the_SAME_orbit_face = prove (`!(H:(A)hypermap) x.
        set_of_face_meeting_node H x = set_of_face_meeting_node (opposite_hypermap H) x`,
   REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[set_of_face_meeting_node] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[opposite_components; dart; tuple_opposite_hypermap]);;


(* LEMMA: general *)
let the_SAME_type = prove(`!H (x:A). type_of_node H x = type_of_node (opposite_hypermap H) x`,
   REWRITE_TAC[type_of_node; PAIR_EQ] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM the_SAME_orbit_triangles] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM the_SAME_orbit_quadrilaterals] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM the_SAME_orbit_exceptional]);;



(* LEMMA: tame_12o *)
let opposite_tame_12o = prove(`!H:(A)hypermap. tame_12o H ==> tame_12o (opposite_hypermap H)`,
    REWRITE_TAC[tame_12o] THEN
      REWRITE_TAC[node_type_exceptional_face; exceptional_face] THEN
      REWRITE_TAC[node_exceptional_face] THEN
      SIMP_TAC[opposite_components; GSYM the_SAME_type] THEN
      SIMP_TAC[exceptional_face; opposite_components]);;


(* LEMMA: tame_13a *)
let opposite_tame_13a = prove(`!H:(A)hypermap.
        tame_13a H ==> tame_13a (opposite_hypermap H)`,
   GEN_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[tame_13a] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[admissible_weight; adm_1; adm_2; adm_3] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM the_SAME_type] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM the_SAME_orbit_exceptional] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM the_SAME_orbit_quadrilaterals] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM the_SAME_orbit_triangles] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[GSYM the_SAME_orbit_face] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[opposite_components] THEN
     STRIP_TAC THEN
     EXISTS_TAC `w:(A->bool)->real` THEN
     ASM_REWRITE_TAC[] THEN
     POP_ASSUM MP_TAC THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[total_weight] THEN
     REWRITE_TAC[opposite_sets_of_components]);;




(* LEMMA: tame H ==> tame (opposite H) *)
let tame_opposite_hypermap = prove ( `!(H:(A)hypermap). tame_hypermap H ==> tame_hypermap (opposite_hypermap H)`,
    GEN_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[tame_hypermap; tame_1; tame_2; tame_3; tame_4; tame_5a] THEN
      SIMP_TAC[opposite_hypermap_plain; opposite_planar; opposite_hypermap_connected; opposite_hypermap_simple] THEN
      SIMP_TAC[opposite_nondegenerate; opposite_no_loops; opposite_no_double_joints] THEN
      SIMP_TAC[CARD_faces1; CARD_in_face; CARD_nodes; CARD_in_node] THEN
      SIMP_TAC[opposite_tame_12o; opposite_tame_13a]);;




(* LEMMA: the main result *)
let PPHEUFG = prove (`!(H:(A)hypermap). tame_hypermap H <=> tame_hypermap (opposite_hypermap H)`,
   GEN_TAC THEN EQ_TAC THENL
     [
       REWRITE_TAC[tame_opposite_hypermap];
       DISCH_TAC THEN
         ONCE_REWRITE_TAC[GSYM opposite_opposite_hypermap_eq_hypermap] THEN
         MATCH_MP_TAC tame_opposite_hypermap THEN
         ASM_REWRITE_TAC[]
     ]);;





end;;