(* ========================================================================= *)
(* The type "real^2" regarded as the complex numbers. *)
(* *)
(* (c) Copyright, John Harrison 1998-2008 *)
(* (c) Copyright, Valentina Bruno 2010 *)
(* ========================================================================= *)
needs "Multivariate/integration.ml";;
new_type_abbrev("complex",`:real^2`);;
let prioritize_complex() =
overload_interface("--",`vector_neg:complex->complex`);
overload_interface("+",`vector_add:complex->complex->complex`);
overload_interface("-",`vector_sub:complex->complex->complex`);
overload_interface("*",`complex_mul:complex->complex->complex`);
overload_interface("/",`complex_div:complex->complex->complex`);
overload_interface("pow",`complex_pow:complex->num->complex`);
overload_interface("inv",`complex_inv:complex->complex`);;
prioritize_complex();;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Real and imaginary parts of a number. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let RE_DEF = new_definition
`Re(z:complex) = z$1`;;
let IM_DEF = new_definition
`Im(z:complex) = z$2`;;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Real injection and imaginary unit. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Complex multiplication. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let complex_mul = new_definition
`w * z = complex(Re(w) * Re(z) - Im(w) * Im(z),
Re(w) * Im(z) + Im(w) * Re(z))`;;
let complex_inv = new_definition
`inv(z) = complex(Re(z) / (Re(z) pow 2 + Im(z) pow 2),
--(Im(z)) / (Re(z) pow 2 + Im(z) pow 2))`;;
let complex_pow = define
`(x pow 0 = Cx(&1)) /\
(!n. x pow (SUC n) = x * x pow n)`;;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Various handy rewrites. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_EQ_0 = prove
(`z = Cx(&0) <=> Re(z) pow 2 + Im(z) pow 2 = &0`,
REWRITE_TAC[
COMPLEX_EQ;
CX_DEF;
RE;
IM] THEN
EQ_TAC THEN SIMP_TAC[] THEN CONV_TAC REAL_RAT_REDUCE_CONV THEN
DISCH_THEN(MP_TAC o MATCH_MP (REAL_ARITH
`!x y:real. x + y = &0 ==> &0 <= x /\ &0 <= y ==> x = &0 /\ y = &0`)) THEN
REWRITE_TAC[REAL_POW_2;
REAL_LE_SQUARE;
REAL_ENTIRE]);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Pseudo-definitions of other general vector concepts over R^2. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Crude tactic to automate very simple algebraic equivalences. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC =
REWRITE_TAC[COMPLEX_EQ; RE; IM; CX_DEF;
complex_add; complex_neg; complex_sub; complex_mul;
complex_inv; complex_div] THEN
CONV_TAC REAL_FIELD;;
let SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH tm = prove(tm,SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Basic algebraic properties that can be proved automatically by this. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_ADD_AC = prove
(`(m + n = n + m) /\ ((m + n) + p = m + n + p) /\ (m + n + p = n + m + p)`,
SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC);;
let COMPLEX_MUL_AC = prove
(`(m * n = n * m) /\ ((m * n) * p = m * n * p) /\ (m * n * p = n * m * p)`,
SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Sometimes here we need to tweak non-zeroness assertions. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let II_NZ = prove
(`~(
ii = Cx(&0))`,
REWRITE_TAC[
ii] THEN SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Homomorphic embedding properties for Cx mapping. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let CX_INV = prove
(`!x. Cx(inv x) = inv(Cx x)`,
GEN_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[
CX_DEF;
complex_inv;
RE;
IM;
COMPLEX_EQ] THEN
ASM_CASES_TAC `x = &0` THEN ASM_REWRITE_TAC[] THEN
CONV_TAC REAL_RAT_REDUCE_CONV THEN
POP_ASSUM MP_TAC THEN CONV_TAC REAL_FIELD);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Some "linear" things hold for Re and Im too. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* An "expansion" theorem into the traditional notation. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Real and complex parts of ii and multiples. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let RE_MUL_II = prove
(`!z. Re(z *
ii) = --(Im z) /\ Re(
ii * z) = --(Im z)`,
REWRITE_TAC[
ii] THEN SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC);;
let IM_MUL_II = prove
(`!z. Im(z *
ii) = Re z /\ Im(
ii * z) = Re z`,
REWRITE_TAC[
ii] THEN SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Limited "multiplicative" theorems for Re and Im. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let RE_MUL_CX = prove
(`!x z. Re(Cx(x) * z) = x * Re z /\
Re(z * Cx(x)) = Re z * x`,
SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC);;
let IM_MUL_CX = prove
(`!x z. Im(Cx(x) * z) = x * Im z /\
Im(z * Cx(x)) = Im z * x`,
SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Syntax constructors etc. for complex constants. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let is_complex_const =
let cx_tm = `Cx` in
fun tm ->
is_comb tm &
let l,r = dest_comb tm in l = cx_tm & is_ratconst r;;
let dest_complex_const =
let cx_tm = `Cx` in
fun tm ->
let l,r = dest_comb tm in
if l = cx_tm then rat_of_term r
else failwith "dest_complex_const";;
let mk_complex_const =
let cx_tm = `Cx` in
fun r ->
mk_comb(cx_tm,term_of_rat r);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Conversions for arithmetic on complex constants. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_RAT_EQ_CONV =
GEN_REWRITE_CONV I [CX_INJ] THENC REAL_RAT_EQ_CONV;;
let COMPLEX_RAT_MUL_CONV =
GEN_REWRITE_CONV I [GSYM CX_MUL] THENC RAND_CONV REAL_RAT_MUL_CONV;;
let COMPLEX_RAT_ADD_CONV =
GEN_REWRITE_CONV I [GSYM CX_ADD] THENC RAND_CONV REAL_RAT_ADD_CONV;;
let COMPLEX_RAT_POW_CONV =
let x_tm = `x:real`
and n_tm = `n:num` in
let pth = SYM(SPECL [x_tm; n_tm] CX_POW) in
fun tm ->
let lop,r = dest_comb tm in
let op,bod = dest_comb lop in
let th1 = INST [rand bod,x_tm; r,n_tm] pth in
let tm1,tm2 = dest_comb(concl th1) in
if rand tm1 <> tm then failwith "COMPLEX_RAT_POW_CONV" else
let tm3,tm4 = dest_comb tm2 in
TRANS th1 (AP_TERM tm3 (REAL_RAT_REDUCE_CONV tm4));;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Complex polynomial normalizer. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_POLY_CLAUSES = prove
(`(!x y z. x + (y + z) = (x + y) + z) /\
(!x y. x + y = y + x) /\
(!x. Cx(&0) + x = x) /\
(!x y z. x * (y * z) = (x * y) * z) /\
(!x y. x * y = y * x) /\
(!x. Cx(&1) * x = x) /\
(!x. Cx(&0) * x = Cx(&0)) /\
(!x y z. x * (y + z) = x * y + x * z) /\
(!x. x pow 0 = Cx(&1)) /\
(!x n. x pow (SUC n) = x * x pow n)`,
REWRITE_TAC[
complex_pow] THEN SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC)
and COMPLEX_POLY_NEG_CLAUSES = prove
(`(!x. --x = Cx(-- &1) * x) /\
(!x y. x - y = x + Cx(-- &1) * y)`,
SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC);;
let COMPLEX_POLY_NEG_CONV,COMPLEX_POLY_ADD_CONV,COMPLEX_POLY_SUB_CONV,
COMPLEX_POLY_MUL_CONV,COMPLEX_POLY_POW_CONV,COMPLEX_POLY_CONV =
SEMIRING_NORMALIZERS_CONV COMPLEX_POLY_CLAUSES COMPLEX_POLY_NEG_CLAUSES
(is_complex_const,
COMPLEX_RAT_ADD_CONV,COMPLEX_RAT_MUL_CONV,COMPLEX_RAT_POW_CONV)
(<);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Extend it to handle "inv" and division, by constants after normalization. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_RAT_INV_CONV =
REWR_CONV(GSYM CX_INV) THENC RAND_CONV REAL_RAT_INV_CONV;;
let COMPLEX_POLY_CONV =
let neg_tm = `(--):complex->complex`
and inv_tm = `inv:complex->complex`
and add_tm = `(+):complex->complex->complex`
and sub_tm = `(-):complex->complex->complex`
and mul_tm = `(*):complex->complex->complex`
and div_tm = `(/):complex->complex->complex`
and pow_tm = `(pow):complex->num->complex`
and div_conv = REWR_CONV complex_div in
let rec COMPLEX_POLY_CONV tm =
if not(is_comb tm) or is_ratconst tm then REFL tm else
let lop,r = dest_comb tm in
if lop = neg_tm then
let th1 = AP_TERM lop (COMPLEX_POLY_CONV r) in
TRANS th1 (COMPLEX_POLY_NEG_CONV (rand(concl th1)))
else if lop = inv_tm then
let th1 = AP_TERM lop (COMPLEX_POLY_CONV r) in
TRANS th1 (TRY_CONV COMPLEX_RAT_INV_CONV (rand(concl th1)))
else if not(is_comb lop) then REFL tm else
let op,l = dest_comb lop in
if op = pow_tm then
let th1 = AP_THM (AP_TERM op (COMPLEX_POLY_CONV l)) r in
TRANS th1 (TRY_CONV COMPLEX_POLY_POW_CONV (rand(concl th1)))
else if op = add_tm or op = mul_tm or op = sub_tm then
let th1 = MK_COMB(AP_TERM op (COMPLEX_POLY_CONV l),
COMPLEX_POLY_CONV r) in
let fn = if op = add_tm then COMPLEX_POLY_ADD_CONV
else if op = mul_tm then COMPLEX_POLY_MUL_CONV
else COMPLEX_POLY_SUB_CONV in
TRANS th1 (fn (rand(concl th1)))
else if op = div_tm then
let th1 = div_conv tm in
TRANS th1 (COMPLEX_POLY_CONV (rand(concl th1)))
else REFL tm in
COMPLEX_POLY_CONV;;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Complex number version of usual ring procedure. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_RING,complex_ideal_cofactors =
let COMPLEX_INTEGRAL = prove
(`(!x. Cx(&0) * x = Cx(&0)) /\
(!x y z. (x + y = x + z) <=> (y = z)) /\
(!w x y z. (w * y + x * z = w * z + x * y) <=> (w = x) \/ (y = z))`,
REWRITE_TAC[
COMPLEX_ENTIRE; SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH
`(w * y + x * z = w * z + x * y) <=>
(w - x) * (y - z) = Cx(&0)`] THEN
SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC)
and COMPLEX_RABINOWITSCH = prove
(`!x y:complex. ~(x = y) <=> ?z. (x - y) * z = Cx(&1)`,
REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN
GEN_REWRITE_TAC (LAND_CONV o RAND_CONV) [GSYM
COMPLEX_SUB_0] THEN
MESON_TAC[
COMPLEX_MUL_RINV;
COMPLEX_MUL_LZERO;
SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH `~(Cx(&1) = Cx(&0))`])
and COMPLEX_IIII = prove
(`
ii *
ii + Cx(&1) = Cx(&0)`,
REWRITE_TAC[
ii;
CX_DEF;
complex_mul;
complex_add;
RE;
IM] THEN
AP_TERM_TAC THEN BINOP_TAC THEN REAL_ARITH_TAC) in
let ring,ideal =
RING_AND_IDEAL_CONV
(dest_complex_const,mk_complex_const,COMPLEX_RAT_EQ_CONV,
`(--):complex->
complex`,`(+):complex->complex->
complex`,
`(-):complex->complex->
complex`,`(inv):complex->
complex`,
`(*):complex->complex->complex`,`(/):complex->complex->complex`,
`(pow):complex->num->complex`,
COMPLEX_INTEGRAL,COMPLEX_RABINOWITSCH,COMPLEX_POLY_CONV)
and ii_tm = `ii` and iiii_tm = concl COMPLEX_IIII in
(fun tm -> if free_in ii_tm tm then
MP (ring (mk_imp(iiii_tm,tm))) COMPLEX_IIII
else ring tm),
ideal;;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Most basic properties of inverses. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_INV_INV = prove
(`!x:complex. inv(inv x) = x`,
GEN_TAC THEN ASM_CASES_TAC `x = Cx(&0)` THEN
ASM_REWRITE_TAC[
COMPLEX_INV_0] THEN
POP_ASSUM MP_TAC THEN
MAP_EVERY (fun t -> MP_TAC(SPEC t
COMPLEX_MUL_RINV))
[`x:complex`; `inv(x):complex`] THEN
CONV_TAC COMPLEX_RING);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* And also field procedure. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_FIELD =
let prenex_conv =
TOP_DEPTH_CONV BETA_CONV THENC
PURE_REWRITE_CONV[FORALL_SIMP; EXISTS_SIMP; complex_div;
COMPLEX_INV_INV; COMPLEX_INV_MUL; GSYM COMPLEX_POW_INV] THENC
NNFC_CONV THENC DEPTH_BINOP_CONV `(/\)` CONDS_CELIM_CONV THENC
PRENEX_CONV
and setup_conv = NNF_CONV THENC WEAK_CNF_CONV THENC CONJ_CANON_CONV
and is_inv =
let inv_tm = `inv:complex->complex`
and is_div = is_binop `(/):complex->complex->complex` in
fun tm -> (is_div tm or (is_comb tm & rator tm = inv_tm)) &
not(is_ratconst(rand tm)) in
let BASIC_COMPLEX_FIELD tm =
let is_freeinv t = is_inv t & free_in t tm in
let itms = setify(map rand (find_terms is_freeinv tm)) in
let hyps = map (fun t -> SPEC t COMPLEX_MUL_RINV) itms in
let tm' = itlist (fun th t -> mk_imp(concl th,t)) hyps tm in
let th1 = setup_conv tm' in
let cjs = conjuncts(rand(concl th1)) in
let ths = map COMPLEX_RING cjs in
let th2 = EQ_MP (SYM th1) (end_itlist CONJ ths) in
rev_itlist (C MP) hyps th2 in
fun tm ->
let th0 = prenex_conv tm in
let tm0 = rand(concl th0) in
let avs,bod = strip_forall tm0 in
let th1 = setup_conv bod in
let ths = map BASIC_COMPLEX_FIELD (conjuncts(rand(concl th1))) in
EQ_MP (SYM th0) (GENL avs (EQ_MP (SYM th1) (end_itlist CONJ ths)));;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* More trivial lemmas. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_INV_EQ_0 = prove
(`!x. inv x = Cx(&0) <=> x = Cx(&0)`,
GEN_TAC THEN ASM_CASES_TAC `x = Cx(&0)` THEN
ASM_REWRITE_TAC[
COMPLEX_INV_0] THEN POP_ASSUM MP_TAC THEN
CONV_TAC COMPLEX_FIELD);;
let COMPLEX_INV_EQ_1 = prove
(`!x. inv x = Cx(&1) <=> x = Cx(&1)`,
GEN_TAC THEN ASM_CASES_TAC `x = Cx(&0)` THEN
ASM_REWRITE_TAC[
COMPLEX_INV_0] THEN POP_ASSUM MP_TAC THEN
CONV_TAC COMPLEX_FIELD);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Powers. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_DIV_POW = prove
(`!x:complex n k:num.
~(x= Cx(&0)) /\ k <= n /\ ~(k = 0)
==> x pow (n-k) = x pow n / x pow k`,
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Norms (aka "moduli"). *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Complex conjugate. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Conjugation is an automorphism. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Slightly ad hoc theorems relating multiplication, inverse and conjugation *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Norm versus components for complex numbers. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Complex square roots. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let CSQRT_UNIQUE = prove
(`!s z. s pow 2 = z /\ (&0 < Re s \/ Re s = &0 /\ &0 <= Im s)
==>
csqrt z = s`,
REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN DISCH_THEN(CONJUNCTS_THEN ASSUME_TAC) THEN
FIRST_X_ASSUM(SUBST_ALL_TAC o SYM) THEN
MP_TAC(SPEC `(s:complex) pow 2`
CSQRT) THEN
SIMP_TAC[COMPLEX_RING `a pow 2 = b pow 2 <=> a = b \/ a = --b:complex`] THEN
STRIP_TAC THEN ASM_REWRITE_TAC[COMPLEX_RING `--z = z <=> z = Cx(&0)`] THEN
FIRST_ASSUM(MP_TAC o AP_TERM `Re`) THEN
FIRST_X_ASSUM(MP_TAC o AP_TERM `Im`) THEN
REWRITE_TAC[
RE_NEG;
IM_NEG;
COMPLEX_EQ;
RE_CX;
IM_CX] THEN
MP_TAC(SPEC `(s:complex) pow 2`
CSQRT_PRINCIPAL) THEN
POP_ASSUM MP_TAC THEN REAL_ARITH_TAC);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* A few more complex-specific cases of vector notions. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Complex-specific theorems about sums. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* The complex numbers that are real (zero imaginary part). *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let IN_SEGMENT_CX = prove
(`!a b x. Cx(x)
IN segment[Cx(a),Cx(b)] <=>
a <= x /\ x <= b \/ b <= x /\ x <= a`,
REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[
segment;
IN_ELIM_THM] THEN
REWRITE_TAC[
COMPLEX_CMUL; GSYM
CX_ADD;
CX_INJ; GSYM
CX_MUL] THEN
ASM_CASES_TAC `a:real = b` THENL
[ASM_REWRITE_TAC[REAL_ARITH `(&1 - u) * b + u * b = b`] THEN
ASM_CASES_TAC `x:real = b` THEN ASM_REWRITE_TAC[REAL_LE_ANTISYM] THEN
EXISTS_TAC `&0` THEN REWRITE_TAC[
REAL_POS];
ALL_TAC] THEN
EQ_TAC THENL
[DISCH_THEN(X_CHOOSE_THEN `u:real`
(CONJUNCTS_THEN2 STRIP_ASSUME_TAC SUBST1_TAC)) THEN
REWRITE_TAC[REAL_ARITH `a <= (&1 - u) * a + u * b <=> &0 <= u * (b - a)`;
REAL_ARITH `b <= (&1 - u) * a + u * b <=> &0 <= (&1 - u) * (a - b)`;
REAL_ARITH `(&1 - u) * a + u * b <= a <=> &0 <= u * (a - b)`;
REAL_ARITH `(&1 - u) * a + u * b <= b <=> &0 <= (&1 - u) * (b - a)`] THEN
DISJ_CASES_TAC(REAL_ARITH `a <= b \/ b <= a`) THENL
[DISJ1_TAC; DISJ2_TAC] THEN
CONJ_TAC THEN MATCH_MP_TAC
REAL_LE_MUL THEN
ASM_REAL_ARITH_TAC;
ALL_TAC] THEN
STRIP_TAC THENL
[SUBGOAL_THEN `&0 < b - a` ASSUME_TAC THENL
[ASM_REAL_ARITH_TAC;
EXISTS_TAC `(x - a:real) / (b - a)`];
SUBGOAL_THEN `&0 < a - b` ASSUME_TAC THENL
[ASM_REAL_ARITH_TAC;
EXISTS_TAC `(a - x:real) / (a - b)`]] THEN
(CONJ_TAC THENL
[ALL_TAC; UNDISCH_TAC `~(a:real = b)` THEN CONV_TAC REAL_FIELD]) THEN
ASM_SIMP_TAC[
REAL_LE_LDIV_EQ;
REAL_LE_RDIV_EQ] THEN
ASM_REAL_ARITH_TAC);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Useful bound-type theorems for real quantities. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Geometric progression. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let VSUM_GP = prove
(`!x m n.
vsum(m..n) (\i. x pow i) =
if n < m then Cx(&0)
else if x = Cx(&1) then Cx(&((n + 1) - m))
else (x pow m - x pow (SUC n)) / (Cx(&1) - x)`,
let VSUM_GP_OFFSET = prove
(`!x m n.
vsum(m..m+n) (\i. x pow i) =
if x = Cx(&1) then Cx(&n) + Cx(&1)
else x pow m * (Cx(&1) - x pow (SUC n)) / (Cx(&1) - x)`,
REPEAT GEN_TAC THEN REWRITE_TAC[
VSUM_GP; ARITH_RULE `~(m + n < m:num)`] THEN
COND_CASES_TAC THEN ASM_REWRITE_TAC[] THENL
[REWRITE_TAC[REAL_OF_NUM_ADD; GSYM
CX_ADD] THEN
AP_TERM_TAC THEN AP_TERM_TAC THEN ARITH_TAC;
REWRITE_TAC[
complex_div;
complex_pow;
COMPLEX_POW_ADD] THEN
SIMPLE_COMPLEX_ARITH_TAC]);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Basics about polynomial functions: extremal behaviour and root counts. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
let COMPLEX_SUB_POLYFUN_ALT = prove
(`!a x y n.
1 <= n
==>
vsum(0..n) (\i. a i * x pow i) -
vsum(0..n) (\i. a i * y pow i) =
(x - y) *
vsum(0..n-1) (\j.
vsum(0..n-j-1) (\k. a(j+k+1) * y pow k) * x pow j)`,
REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN ASM_SIMP_TAC[
COMPLEX_SUB_POLYFUN] THEN AP_TERM_TAC THEN
MATCH_MP_TAC
VSUM_EQ_NUMSEG THEN X_GEN_TAC `j:num` THEN REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN
REWRITE_TAC[] THEN AP_THM_TAC THEN AP_TERM_TAC THEN
MATCH_MP_TAC
VSUM_EQ_GENERAL_INVERSES THEN
MAP_EVERY EXISTS_TAC
[`\i. i - (j + 1)`; `\k. j + k + 1`] THEN
REWRITE_TAC[
IN_NUMSEG] THEN REPEAT STRIP_TAC THEN
TRY(BINOP_TAC THEN AP_TERM_TAC) THEN ASM_ARITH_TAC);;
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
(* Complex products. *)
(* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)